The impact of magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging and the surgical planning for treating small bowel neoplasms

PURPOSE: The role of MR enteroclysis/enterography (MRE) in the diagnosis of small bowel (SB) tumor has not been fully evaluated. The aims of this study were to assess the capability of MRE correctly identifying the site, stage and histology of such neoplasms. METHODS: MR enteroclysis/enterography was employed in consecutive patients suspected of having an SB tumor following negative upper and lower endoscopies. The SB was subdivided into proximal jejunum, middle SB and distal ileum. The histological examination (HE) of the surgical specimen was the reference standard. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were examined. Thirty-one out of 32 (96.9 %) SB detected by HE were correctly identified by MRE. The concordance rate between MRE and HE was 100 % for localization, and 87.1, 80.6 and 96.8 % for T, N and M stages, respectively. The concordance rate was 62.2 % for histological diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The high concordance rates between MRE and HE for the localization of SB tumors and for their staging have a significant impact upon surgical planning, particularly if laparoscopy is being considered. A preoperative histological diagnosis is not sufficiently reliabl

Retrorectal tumors: the choice of surgical approach based on a new classification.

Because retrorectal-presacral tumors differ in histologic origin, symptoms, and prognosis, and often involve various neighboring structures, successful treatment of this heterogeneous group of tumors depends on the surgical approach chosen and the specialist surgeons involved. We investigated whether a new classification of retrorectal tumors based on findings from CT and MRI would simplify presurgical planning. The clinical records of a series of 34 patients who underwent surgeryfor retrorectal tumors from 1989 to 2003 were reviewed. Two radiologists, who were blind to the patients' records, separately reviewed the preoperative CT and MRI findings and classified tumors according to whether they arose from the presacral area (Group 1), sacrum or spinal cord growing anteriorly (Group 2), or rectum growing posteriorly (Group 3). The preoperative CT and MRI findings for the retrorectal tumors yielded the information required to allow surgery to be properly planned (surgical approach and need to involve various specialist surgeons) in nearly all cases: 17 of the 18 patients (94.5%) with tumors arising from the retrorectal space, all 12 of those with tumors arising from the sacrum or spinal cord, and all four of those with rectal tumors. With the findings yielded by currently available CT and MRI techniques, retrorectal tumors can be anatomically and topographically classified preoperatively so as to allow surgery to be adequately planned in advance and thus optimize the surgical resection

Prospective study comparing multi-detector row CT and endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Upper and lower acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The latest computerized tomography (CT) imaging techniques play an important role in the treatment of this pathology.Twenty-nine patients with severe AGIB (11 upper, 18 lower), all hemodynamically stable, underwent endoscopy followed by a multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scan. Endoscopic and MDCT accuracy for the anatomical localization and etiology of AGIB was assessed, the diagnosis being considered correct when the two procedures were concordant or when the diagnosis was confirmed by angiographic, surgical, or post-mortem findings.The sensitivity in identifying the site and etiology of bleeding was, respectively, 100\% and 90.9\% for the MDCT scan, compared with 72.7\% and 54.5\% for endoscopy in upper AGIB, and 100\% and 88.2\% for the MDCT scan, compared with 52.9\% and 52.9\% for endoscopy, in lower AGIB.Considering the advantages of MDCT over endoscopy, we propose a new diagnostic algorithm for AGIB

Effectiveness of clinical guidelines in the management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis Results of a prospective diagnostic and therapeutic clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based criteria in the therapeutic choice for sigmoid acute diverticulitis (AD) are lacking. It is necessary to differentiate an acute episode of diverticular disease, not complicated (NCAD) and complicated (CAD) because these stages of diverticular disease needs different approach. METHODS: In a prospective study on 377 consecutive patients admitted for AD, 265 had NCAD and 112 CAD diagnosed with CT scan. Thirty-six of 265 with NCAD were operated on due to two or more previous episodes of AD. On 188 patients with NCAD followed-up, 35 had further episodes of NCAD and 2 had CAD. On 112 CAD patients, 61 had Hinchey I and were submitted to colonic resection. Twenty-three of 24 patients with Hinchey II were treated with percutaneous drainage. All Hinchey II patients were operated on. All the 13 patients with Hinchey III and IV had emergency surgery. RESULTS: We had no mortality and respectively 9.8% and 30% morbidity in Hinchey I and II patients. In Hinchey II patients percutaneous drainage was successful in 21 on 23 (91.3%). In 13 Hinchey III and IV patients the mortality rate was 25%. The comparison of CT findings and pathological results showed a sensitivity of 100% and predictive positive value of respectively 94.4, 96.7, 100 and 100% for NCAD, Hinchey I, Hinchey II and Hinchey III-IV. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic approach of diverticular disease needs to differentiate among an acute episode, NCAD and CAD. Evidence-based therapeutic choices can be reached only by homogeneous diagnostic criteria obtained by CT scan.BACKGROUND: Evidence-based criteria in the therapeutic choice for sigmoid acute diverticulitis (AD) are lacking. It is necessary to differentiate an acute episode of diverticular disease, not complicated (NCAD) and complicated (CAD) because these stages of diverticular disease needs different approach. METHODS: In a prospective study on 377 consecutive patients admitted for AD, 265 had NCAD and 112 CAD diagnosed with CT scan. Thirty-six of 265 with NCAD were operated on due to two or more previous episodes of AD. On 188 patients with NCAD followed-up, 35 had further episodes of NCAD and 2 had CAD. On 112 CAD patients, 61 had Hinchey I and were submitted to colonic resection. Twenty-three of 24 patients with Hinchey II were treated with percutaneous drainage. All Hinchey II patients were operated on. All the 13 patients with Hinchey III and IV had emergency surgery. RESULTS: We had no mortality and respectively 9.8% and 30% morbidity in Hinchey I and II patients. In Hinchey II patients percutaneous drainage was successful in 21 on 23 (91.3%). In 13 Hinchey III and IV patients the mortality rate was 25%. The comparison of CT findings and pathological results showed a sensitivity of 100% and predictive positive value of respectively 94.4, 96.7, 100 and 100% for NCAD, Hinchey I, Hinchey II and Hinchey III-IV. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic approach of diverticular disease needs to differentiate among an acute episode, NCAD and CAD. Evidence-based therapeutic choices can be reached only by homogeneous diagnostic criteria obtained by CT scan